Clinical efficacy of ZERBAXA® (ceftolozane and tazobactam) against HABP/VABP
Treatment of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP)
Learn about:
Study design
ZERBAXA was studied in critically ill patients.1
Primary efficacy endpoint: all-cause mortality at day 28. Objective was to demonstrate the noninferiority of ZERBAXA versus meropenem in adults with HABP/VABP. For analysis of the overall treatment differences, 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (Cls) were calculated as stratified Newcombe Cls.1
100% of patients in the trial were ventilated


Current antibiotic failure
Approximately 13% of patients were failing current antibacterial therapy for HABP/VABP


APACHE II score
Patients had a median baseline APACHE II score of 17, indicating a 24% mortality rate (1/3 of patients had a score of ≥20, a 40% estimated mortality)1,2


Hospitalized for ≥5 days
77% of patients had been hospitalized for ≥5 days, 92% in the ICU1
Primary endpoint
ZERBAXA achieved primary endpoint of noninferiority in day 28 all-cause mortality vs meropenem in adult patients with HABP/VABP in ITT population.1
The analysis population for the primary endpoint was the ITT population, which included all randomized patients.1
- In the vHABP subgroup of patients (~28.5%), there was a favorable response for ZERBAXA in day 28 all-cause mortality.
- In the VABP subgroup, day 28 all-cause mortality was 24.0% (63/263) for ZERBAXA and 20.3% (52/256) for meropenem
Kaplan-Meier for day 28 all-cause mortality including overall ITT population and subgroup analyses.
The Kaplan-Meier plots were not powered to demonstrate statistical significance in subgroups and individual time points. Subgroup analyses were not designed for noninferiority testing.1,3,4,5
Kaplan-Meier plots of day 28 all-cause mortality
overall ITT population1,3
vHABP subgroup4
VABP subgroup1,3
Subgroup of participants who failed prior antibiotic therapy in ASPECT-NP5,a
aUnstratified Newcombe CIs; positive differences are in favor of ceftolozane/tazobactam; negative differences are in favor of meropenem.
Additional information and limitations for failed prior antibiotic therapy subgroup5:
- Participants who were failing prior antibacterial therapy were a prospectively defined subgroup.
- Antibacterial therapy received 72 h prior to starting study treatment in participants who were failing antibacterial treatment before included: beta-lactam/BLI, fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, aminoglycosides, macrolides, and carbapenems.
- Participants with missing/indeterminate data were reported as deceased.
Outcomes in participants with failure of initial antibacterial therapy for hospital‑acquired/ventilator‑associated bacterial pneumonia prior to enrollment in the randomized, controlled phase 3 ASPECT‑NP trial of ceftolozane/tazobactam versus meropenem by Kollef et al. Critical Care (2022) 26:373 at https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04192-w, is licensed under Creative Commons 4.0 at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
References
1. Kollef MH, Nováček M, Kivistik Ü, et al. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(12):1299-1311.
2. APACHE II Calculator. Updated November 10, 2018. Accessed June 11, 2025. https://clincalc.com/lcuMortality/ APACHEll.aspx
3. Data available on request from the Merck National Service Center via email at daprequests@merck.com. Please specify information package US-ZER-01413.
4. Timsit JF, Huntington JA, Wunderink RG, et al. Crit Care. 2021;25:290.
5. Kollef MH, Timsit JF, Martin-Loeches I, et al. Crit Care. 2022;26(1):373.